1. Skip to Menu
  2. Skip to Content
  3. Skip to Footer>
  • The Future of PC and Mobile Processors PC Magazine logo

    I've spent a lot of time with a number of hardware manufacturers recently, trying to get a glimpse into the next generation of processors and the ways in which they'll impact future gadgets and PCs. In all my meetings, one term has arisen time and again: SOC, or system-on-a-chip.

    Traditionally, chips have been created independently and then coupled together to provide multiple computing features. For example, a manufacturer would create a core processor like an Intel Centrino with a built-in Wi-Fi radio, and then attach that to a systems board, perhaps linking it together with a separate graphics co-processor, in order to deliver enhanced PC graphics. Another might take an ARM core processor and then add on additional features like extended graphics to enhance device functionality.

  • Apple's iPad: Live up the Hype? It Will....
    It was interesting to hear all the chatter after last week's iPad launch. Most reactions I heard from other analysts and media were lukewarm at best...which was what I expected. If you think about it, how can anything live up to the kind of hype leading up to this launch? But there was a lot missed in the media about the event and the product that I hope to share in order to maintain our perspective on not only the iPad but on Apple and their products.  
  • Innovation Abounds - CES 2010 Post Show Analysis

    This year's CES was very interesting. I had felt for the past few years that CES was sorely lacking in the innovation department. But this year it looks like things have changed in the technology industry. Technology companies have realized that to reach the consumer the pace of innovation needs to accelerate, and this year's CES was a start in that direction.  Several things stuck out that I'd like to highlight:  

  • Apple's Competitive Advantage

    One of the primary things about being an effective technology industry analysis firm is that we have to clearly communicate our perspectives about the technology industry as a whole to our clients. This requires more than just the regurgitation of information as we gather it in the field. It requires explaining more fundamental elements of what is happening and why. It is because of this that we seem to get one question common to many of the companies that we speak with and provide services to. That question is: "Why is Apple doing so well and what can we do to compete?"


    Particularly of interest to many is why Apple appears to be recession-proof while many others in the hardware business had a rough 18 months or so. There are more reasons then I have time to go into in this article as to why Apple appears to be unstoppable, so I will highlight just a few. I am a big picture strategic thinker by nature and I love thinking about and strategizing around competitive advantage and differentiation. That is why I love analyzing Apple, because they play the strategic game extremely well, particularly when it comes to developing strategies to defend their competitive advantage. There are three key areas that stick out to me as particularly defensible for Apple. 

The Netbook Conundrum

PDF Print E-mail

 Most of the PC industry dismissed the ASUS EeePC when it was launched—some considered it a 'toy" laptop. Oops! To their monumental surprise, netbooks struck a chord. But the decision ASUS made to use Linux on its first version was problematic. It didn't meet the expectations of early EeePC buyers because it wasn't compatible with their existing software, printers, cameras, and so on.

So ASUS asked Microsoft for a version of Windows XP that it could use with these small laptops, and Redmond agreed. While this helped the netbook market grow exponentially, it has had an effect on Microsoft's profitability, since the company charges around $15 for XP on a netbook compared with roughly $50 to $70 for various versions of Vista on laptops.

The numbers people say that netbooks saw an 80 percent growth rate in 2009 (compared with laptop growth of around 13 percent). According to Gartner, that means that 21 million netbooks will be sold this year. That sounds like good news. But there's a downside, too, since netbooks have much lower profit margins and, even worse, have cannibalized sales of laptops. They have also reset people's expectations of what portable computers should cost and driven down the average selling price of laptops across the board. Netbooks helped ASUS and especially Acer gain market share and generate much-needed user demand for their products, but those companies still have profit-margin issues to deal with, as well as the sleeping giants they've awakened in the form of, for example, HP and Dell, who have entered the netbook market with a vengeance.

The low-margin issue and the physical limitations associated with netbooks have not gone unnoticed by Apple, which is conspicuously absent in the netbook space. But Apple COO Tim Cook, in the post-earnings analysts call on April 22, made it very clear that Apple is not interested in netbooks, citing the cramped keyboards, small screens, and overall poor experience in these small PCs. Apple is well known for protecting its margins, so it should come as no surprise that the company has no interest in netbooks.

Netbooks won't go away, but Tim Cook's comments about their failings can possibly help the industry turn the corner and move the mobile computer business toward some level of profitability, at least, in mainstream laptops. To do this, the industry has to execute flawlessly on three key issues.

First, the message: Consumers need to see past the value of netbooks to their limitations: their small keyboards and screens and their underpowered processors. And the industry has to offer an alternative that delivers a lot more at similar pricing. Intel and AMD are pushing vendors to deploy ultra-low-voltage (ULV) processors in systems that are more like traditional thin-and-light laptops. I have written in the past about low-cost thin-and-lights as alternatives; since then the industry has started referring to these as ultrathins. Most will be under 0.8 inch thick, sport 11-to13-inch TFT screens, weigh less than 3.5 pounds, and be priced from $599 to $1,099. 

 

 

 

Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy

Innovation Sponsor

  • Banner

Copyright © Creative Strategies, Inc 2009-2010